Home
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
Facebook
Twitter
RSS Feed
Printable version
Centralized data protection plans high priority for IT.
By Jennifer deJong
April 15, 2008 —
(Page 1 of 4)
Until the data center at headquarters started asking for them, no one at the regional sales office even knew they were missing. Now all 10 staffers are scrambling to lay their hands on the backup tapes believed to contain sensitive data, including customer social security numbers. Are they in that stack sitting on the receptionist’s desk, waiting to be shipped off site to storage? Or maybe the tapes went out with the last batch—and fell off the truck?
Employees at small, remote offices without local IT staff hate to admit their data protection approach is that haphazard. But storage experts say the missing tape scenario and chaos that surrounds it isn’t at all far-fetched. Lacking clear direction from corporate IT, remote offices don’t know how to protect data properly, said Gail Greener, a senior director of product management for storage solution provider EMC, and many still rely on older technologies likes tape backup. “The receptionist is dealing with the tapes, stacking them, shipping them.” Most small sites make some effort around backup and data retention, but such efforts are typically error prone and inconsistent, the experts said.
“Often, corporate [IT administrators] don’t know if backups are even being run [at remote sites],” said Forrester analyst Stephanie Balaouras. A company may follow a rigorous data protection plan at headquarters, added Steve Rodin, president of Storagepipe, a Web-based provider of backup and recovery software. “But the plan doesn’t extend to remote offices.”
At many organizations, the haphazard approach to remote storage is beginning to change, chiefly in response to federal regulations like Sarbanes-Oxley, which, among other things, forces public companies to retain e-mail and other records that document key business activities. To ensure compliance with this other mandates, top executives are demanding corporate IT shops develop formal data protection policies and apply them across the enterprise—including remote sites. For a long time, there wasn’t wide enough recognition of this risk, and that was a real weakness in IT strategies, said Balaouras. “But now regulatory compliance is having a big impact.”
Next Page
Related Search Term(s):
Missing Tapes
,
Chaos Rule
,
Remote Sites
Pages
1
2
3
4
Share this link:
http://www.sysmannews.com/link/31956
Related Articles
Building a Remote Office Data Protection Strategy
Pragmatism and IT staffs for large offices are useful starting points.
In a Perfect World
Every company has a remote office data strategy.
New Tool Compares SharePoint Sites
MetaVis' Live Compare can pinpoint differences in content, information architecture, security groups and permissions
Add comment
Name*
Email*
Country
United States
Canada
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua & Barbuda
Antilles, Netherlands
Arabia, Saudi
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas, The
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote D'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor (Timor-Leste)
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French Polynesia
Gabon
Gambia, the
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guinea, Equatorial
Guyana
Haiti
Holland (see Netherlands)
Honduras
Hong Kong, (China)
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea (North)
Korea (South)
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macao, (China)
Macedonia, TFYR
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia, Federated States of
Moldova, Republic of
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar (ex-Burma)
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
Northern Mariana Islands
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian Territory
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Romania
Russia (Russian Federation)
Rwanda
Saint Helena
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia & Montenegro
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka (ex-Ceilan)
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syrian Arab Republic
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania, United Republic of
Thailand
Timor-Leste (East Timor)
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad & Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks and Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City State (Holy See)
Venezuela
VietNam
Virgin Islands, British
Virgin Islands, U.S.
Wallis and Futuna
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zanzibar
Zimbabwe
[Not specified]
Comment
Preview