Home
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
Facebook
Twitter
RSS Feed
Printable version
The Microsoft Stack: Getting the Most out of Technical Conferences
By Patrick Hynds
July 1, 2008 —
(Page 1 of 3)
As of this writing, I am on my way to Tech·Ed 2008 in Orlando, and I am thinking about what today’s technical person gets out of a large tech conference—with some particular emphasis on Tech·Ed and the other Microsoft-run conferences.
This year, Microsoft has adopted the model used for European Tech·Eds of splitting into different weeks the developer content and the IT pro (infrastructure) content. Time will tell, but I think this is a good change, since it lets the attendees pick what most matters to them. The keynotes, labs and even the extracurriculars should be better for everyone because their focus is sharpened.
But for those, like me, who play on both sides, it means either taking two weeks for a conference (not reasonable for the vast majority) or picking one. Since this kind of hybridism is pretty rare, I think the move to separate the content is justified, especially given the explosion of information we need just to get the job done these days.
So assuming the split conference weeks is a good thing, what value is to be had, in general, and more to the point, is it worth your time, and mine, to go?
Like all non-trivial questions, the answer is a bit nuanced. How do you assimilate information? If you actually read the manual, then you are unlikely to be interested in a conference for the session content. If you value the human interaction and the ability to ask a question in person, then there is no substitute for Tech·Ed.
I often see large groups of people waiting with a question or two about their real-world problem for the speaker after a session. Much of the time, the result is that if they get their burning and strategic question answered or even advanced toward an answer, then the whole cost of attendance seems worth it. It isn’t quite free consulting, since you have to pay to get there and pay to get in, but you are unlikely to find a gathering of people with such critical knowledge more interested in helping you than at a conference sponsored by the vendor. Even the non-MS speakers want to keep everyone happy. So if you are attending and aren’t gathering up those questions before you leave, you are missing a major advantage.
Next Page
Related Search Term(s):
Microsoft
Pages
1
2
3
Share this link:
http://www.sysmannews.com/link/32434
Related Articles
The Microsoft Stack: Microsoft's SharePoint Hits Sweet Spot as the Next Killer App
Microsoft has positioned SharePoint to be in the perfect spot for its benefits, between databases and SQL Server. Unless Microsoft becomes too ambitious, SharePoint will continue to help enterprises collaborate on projects.
The Microsoft Stack: In the Microsoft Trenches
Patrick Hynds describes how he plans to tackle Microsoft developments, and he starts off with Internet Information Server 7, which aims to fix problems present in previous versions.
Metalogix, Microsoft Bring Out Free Migration Accelerator
The tool will assist SharePoint users in using SharePoint 2010's search capabilities in a business setting
Add comment
Name*
Email*
Country
United States
Canada
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua & Barbuda
Antilles, Netherlands
Arabia, Saudi
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas, The
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote D'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor (Timor-Leste)
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French Polynesia
Gabon
Gambia, the
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guinea, Equatorial
Guyana
Haiti
Holland (see Netherlands)
Honduras
Hong Kong, (China)
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea (North)
Korea (South)
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macao, (China)
Macedonia, TFYR
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia, Federated States of
Moldova, Republic of
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar (ex-Burma)
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
Northern Mariana Islands
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian Territory
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Romania
Russia (Russian Federation)
Rwanda
Saint Helena
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia & Montenegro
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka (ex-Ceilan)
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syrian Arab Republic
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania, United Republic of
Thailand
Timor-Leste (East Timor)
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad & Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks and Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City State (Holy See)
Venezuela
VietNam
Virgin Islands, British
Virgin Islands, U.S.
Wallis and Futuna
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zanzibar
Zimbabwe
[Not specified]
Comment
Preview